Back to All Events

Rapid-Fire & Poster Presentations

Rapid-Fire Sessions:

This part of the session features a series of five-minute presentations on hot topics in clinical research. These dynamic, “rapid-fire” presentations are designed to differentiate between myth and fact, provide guidance on hot topics and offer fun inspirational stories.

Mind the Gap: Achieving and Maintaining Effective Communication Between Sites and Sponsors
Speaker: Morgan Heck
This session presents a conversation outline for covering the many potential pain points that may arise in communications between clinical trial sites and sponsors who are new to one another, as well as long-term partners who nevertheless are experiencing ongoing miscommunication hassles.

Tools and Measurements for Driving Diversity and Inclusion in Clinical Trials
Speaker: Cameron Davis
This session examines how to identify resources and strategies for achieving operational excellence, improving access, and enhancing diverse and inclusive representation of patients in clinical trials.

Poster Sessions:

A 5–8-minute multimedia "poster presentation" given from the podium will feature a case study and real-life lessons learned around operational and process efficiencies in clinical research.

Evolving Training for and Satisfaction with Electronic Medical Record Systems
Speaker: Paula Smailes, DNP, RN, CCRP
This session addresses evolving clinical research training at one institution to ensure competency and increase the satisfaction of users of its electronic medical record (EMR) system, along with the value of an eLearning methodology to facilitate training.

Interpreting and Capitalizing on Research Participant Satisfaction Surveys
Speakers: Paula Smailes, DNP, RN, CCRP, Lisa Hafer, Deanna Golden-Kreutz, PhD, Holly Bookless, BSN, RN, NE-BC, Emily Brown
This poster focuses on how study sites can most effectively use research participant satisfaction surveys for collecting and benefiting from data on patient demographics, motivating factors for research participation, perceptions on the informed consent process, and questions pertaining to the research experience.